CE Marking & Declaration of Conformity: Art. 47, 48
Art. 47 and 48 EU AI Act set out the declaration of conformity and CE marking for high-risk AI systems. What providers must document and prepare now.
Read more →KomplAI blog
Practice and rollout: inventory, gap analysis, documentation and evidence — how AI compliance actually works day to day.
Art. 47 and 48 EU AI Act set out the declaration of conformity and CE marking for high-risk AI systems. What providers must document and prepare now.
Read more →Art. 72 AI Act requires high-risk providers to systematically monitor their systems post-deployment, including a documented monitoring plan.
Read more →When do distributors and importers become the provider of a high-risk AI system under Art. 25 AI Act? Duties, deadlines and typical contract gaps.
Read more →Art. 16 AI Act sets out twelve duties for high-risk AI providers, from QMS to CE marking. An overview of deadlines and practical compliance gaps.
Read more →Art. 4 AI Act has applied since 02.02.2025: staff and contractors must have adequate AI literacy. What this means and where the typical gaps are.
Read more →Art. 26 EU AI Act sets out deployer obligations: human oversight, logging, and incident reporting. What businesses must actually implement in practice.
Read more →Your AI provider owes you just one document by law: the Art. 13 instructions for use. Technical documentation and the declaration go to the authorities.
Read more →Which procedure applies to high-risk AI systems: Annex VI or VII? Obligations under Art. 43 AI Act explained – including common gaps.
Read more →Art. 17 AI Act requires a documented quality management system for high-risk AI providers. What it covers and where typical gaps arise.
Read more →Before high-risk AI systems under Annex III go live, providers must register them in the EU database under Art. 49 AI Act. Find out what applies and when.
Read more →